Elizabeth. (1985)patibility when you look at the parent-child matchmaking: Root and operations

Lamb, Yards. E., & Gilbride, K. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). In the event the I am not hot, are you currently beautiful or perhaps not?: Physical-appeal analysis and you can dating tastes just like the a purpose of an individual’s individual appeal. Emotional Technology, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic relationship. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict dating (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Level of aspiration. For the J. McV. Search (Ed.), Identity plus the decisions issues (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Press. [ Website links ]

Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting matchmaking relationships destiny that have insiders’ and you can outsiders’ perspective: Just who and what exactly is questioned things. Personal Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Backlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you will relationship quality in newlyweds: Several centered strategy. Journal regarding Identity and you can Social Mindset asianfeels reviews, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]

Legitimizing affairs regarding initiation out-of heterosexual relationship

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Elizabeth. Roentgen. (2006). Sensed resemblance and you will relationships profits one of relationships people: A keen idiographic method. Record from Societal and private Relationships, 23, 865-880. [ Website links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Online dating. Washington, DC: Report to your Pew Websites & American Lifestyle Venture. Retrieved , out-of [ Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the accuracy away from predictions on matchmaking relationship: Exactly how and why do lovers’ forecasts range from the individuals created by observers? Character and you can Public Psychology Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Links ]

The newest appeal-resemblance theory certainly cross-intercourse nearest and dearest: Matchmaking fulfillment, observed similarities, and mind-providing thinking

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers displayed on Very first Worldwide Fulfilling on the Personal Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Backlinks ]

Merkle, Elizabeth.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A beneficial. (2000). Digital matchmaking and virtual related: Conceptualizing desktop mediated romantic relationships. Family relations, 44, 187-192. [ Backlinks ]

Montoya, R. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Try real similarity very important to appeal? A good meta-investigation of real and you will thought resemblance. Journal from Social and personal Relationship, 25, 889-922. [ Links ]

Morry, Yards. Yards. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction as a good predictor out-of similarity ratings; A test of your destination-similarity theory. Diary of Public and personal Dating, 22, 561-584. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you may expansion of one’s SVR idea regarding dyadic combining. Diary regarding ily, 49, 929-947. [ Hyperlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: A great fourteen-season longitudinal study of black colored partners and you can white partners. Record off Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). This new love algorithm Match believes it’s discovered an algorithm having ruling the online dating business: A technical strategy for finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Proper. Company dos.0 Magazine. Recovered on out of [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent survive – Personality similarities into the people. Identity and you will Private Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Website links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Lover choices: Just what characteristics carry out men focus inside their brief-title sexual and you can much time-name romantic couples? Log out-of Therapy and you can Peoples Sex, a dozen, 1-21. [ Website links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest character of notice about initiation and you can span of personal interaction. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict relationships (pp. 209-231). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]